{"id":177,"date":"2011-09-04T10:45:59","date_gmt":"2011-09-04T08:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/?p=177"},"modified":"2011-09-04T18:33:24","modified_gmt":"2011-09-04T16:33:24","slug":"words-with-charisma-or-gravitas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/words-with-charisma-or-gravitas","title":{"rendered":"Words with charisma"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Everyone has their stable of favourite words. Which\u00a0of yours\u00a0hit\u00a0the sweet spot of delight?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/IMG00345-20110619-1109.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-181\" title=\"IMG00345-20110619-1109\" src=\"http:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/IMG00345-20110619-1109-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/IMG00345-20110619-1109-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/IMG00345-20110619-1109.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here are\u00a0a few\u00a0that\u00a0blow my hair back: LUCIDITY (as in a profound\u00a0&#8220;AHA&#8221; moment), VOLUMINOUS (hair which I have not)\u00a0and\u00a0SAGACITY (wisdom \/ good judgment) \u2013 which my\u00a0thinning pate\u00a0proclaims to\u00a0celebrate.<\/p>\n<p>One of my favourite verbs is GLEAN \u2013 it sounds like such a clean, purposeful process of assimilating, sorting, digesting and extruding useful information\u00a0i.e. grasping\u00a0the\u00a0PITH of &#8220;what matters most&#8221; from among the DROSS of communication. GLIB is another expressive verb \u2013 being relatively articulate but insincere&#8230; as in the inconsequential froth of gutter journalism.<\/p>\n<p>Then there are expressive loan words from other cultures that delight. Like the\u00a0Yiddish\u00a0SHLEP, from the German &#8220;to drag&#8221; (e.g. &#8220;It&#8217;s such a schlep standing in queues&#8221;) or GLITCH, originally from the German &#8220;to slip&#8221; \u2013\u00a0which\u00a0also has a satisfyingly\u00a0onomatopoeic quality about it. Almost like the sound when you step on an insect inadvertently. Proofreaders are paid to pick up and rectify errors and omissions&#8230; glitches in the works. And it&#8217;s far\u00a0more polite\u00a0to use\u00a0a euphemism\u00a0like &#8220;having found\u00a0a few\u00a0GREMLINS&#8221; than saying &#8220;I discovered\u00a0some glaring mistakes&#8221;.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>LOQUACIOUS\u00a0 is &#8220;pleasantly talkative&#8221;, though hopefully not MAGNILOQUENT, which is\u00a0&#8220;verbally profuse&#8221;. That would then\u00a0border on the BOMBASTIC (&#8220;high sounding language with little meaning&#8221;, from the Old French &#8220;bombace&#8221; = &#8220;cotton wool used as padding&#8221;\u00a0or\u00a0the Latin &#8220;bombyx&#8221; = &#8220;silkworm&#8221;) and might invite TRUCULENCE (an argumentative mode).<\/p>\n<p>The subtlest word of all is SUBTLE.\u00a0 Latin teacher extraordinaire, Mr Quinn, at the International School of Geneva, once elucidated the etymology or origin of the word. It&#8217;s simply a powerful combination of &#8220;sub&#8221; (under) and\u00a0&#8220;tela&#8221; (the web). Try touching a spider&#8217;s web from beneath, with\u00a0your index\u00a0finger, ever so gently, to understand the supremely delicate stickiness that informs the subtle act. This insight\u00a0alone,\u00a0to the word&#8217;s significance,\u00a0still continues to enthrall me.<\/p>\n<p>UNCTUOUS, as in\u00a0&#8220;rich&#8221;,\u00a0is used positively\u00a0these days, although its Latin origin (from &#8220;anointing&#8221; \u2013 in the ecclesiastical sense) suggests exaggeration, affectedness or insincerity due to its &#8220;showiness&#8221;. CLOYING takes\u00a0such insincerity a sticky step further to one of ingratiation (from the medieval &#8220;accloy&#8221;, to &#8220;stop up&#8221; or &#8220;choke&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>Its interesting how the underbelly of social behaviour tends to engender the most expressive repertoire of words, such as LURID, LOUCHE and LASCIVIOUS.<\/p>\n<p>SCINTILLATING, whose very letters seems to glint, from the Latin &#8220;scintilla&#8221;,\u00a0&#8220;a spark&#8221;, is itself a brilliantly captivating word.\u00a0&#8220;Brilliant&#8221; has been superseded by &#8220;awesome&#8221; \u2013 a word, by dint of American cultural imperialism\u00a0(tongue firmly in cheek), and overuse, now meets with derision.\u00a0The medieval\u00a0 expression &#8220;awful&#8221;\u00a0 originally meant &#8220;full of awe&#8221;, hence &#8220;inspiring&#8221;. I too,\u00a0find &#8220;awesome&#8221; completely awful, in the modern sense.<\/p>\n<p>But let&#8217;s not end on a LUGUBRIOUS (dismal) note. That&#8217;s the fun of language. When a word or expression has outlived its faddishness\u00a0or reached its sell by date, it will either be discarded or evolve through popular momentum. Neologisms\u00a0are born.\u00a0I&#8217;ve coined the word\u00a0HECTICITY\u00a0 to describe the\u00a0relentless buzz of\u00a0life in the digital age. Hecticity is certainly\u00a0the mother of creativity.\u00a0I do hope\u00a0this post has elicited a moment of metanoia\u00a0 (i.e. a profound awakening \u2013 the opposite of paranoia )\u00a0with respect to\u00a0the\u00a0magic of words.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Everyone has their stable of favourite words. Which\u00a0of yours\u00a0hit\u00a0the sweet spot of delight? Here are\u00a0a few\u00a0that\u00a0blow my hair back: LUCIDITY (as in a profound\u00a0&#8220;AHA&#8221; moment), VOLUMINOUS (hair which I have not)\u00a0and\u00a0SAGACITY (wisdom \/ good judgment) \u2013 which my\u00a0thinning pate\u00a0proclaims to\u00a0celebrate. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/words-with-charisma-or-gravitas\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,1,7],"tags":[30,31,33,32],"class_list":["post-177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-use","category-uncategorized","category-words-2","tag-charismatic-words","tag-loan-words","tag-neologisms","tag-onomatopoeia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":185,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177\/revisions\/185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}