{"id":127,"date":"2011-07-05T20:38:01","date_gmt":"2011-07-05T18:38:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/?p=127"},"modified":"2011-07-06T08:28:35","modified_gmt":"2011-07-06T06:28:35","slug":"whats-in-a-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/whats-in-a-name","title":{"rendered":"What&#8217;s in a name?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Generating names for a product, brand or company is part of the copywriter&#8217;s repertoire.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>With the\u00a0dotcom explosion having monopolised\u00a0nearly all names and permutations thereof, wordsmiths have resorted to\u00a0semantic associations, creating hybridised names as a creative way out of this impasse. e.g. Valprod (value + product) or Intel (intelligent + electronics).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_139\" style=\"width: 302px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/emty-african-spiralhead-nickle.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-139\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-139\" src=\"http:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/emty-african-spiralhead-nickle-292x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"292\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/emty-african-spiralhead-nickle-292x300.jpg 292w, https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/emty-african-spiralhead-nickle-997x1024.jpg 997w, https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/emty-african-spiralhead-nickle.jpg 1169w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 292px) 100vw, 292px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-139\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Nickel artwork by Uwe Pfaff<\/p><\/div>\n<p>However, the latest, most subtle form of name generation involves utilising sound symbolism \u2013 crafting combinations of\u00a0vowels and consonants whose &#8220;sound packages&#8221; are\u00a0tagged phonemes by linguists.<\/p>\n<p>Sound\u00a0associates not only with meanings but also emotions. For example, Laurentian&#8217;s Dr Whissel has proven how\u00a0the sounds &#8220;l&#8221; and\u00a0&#8220;s&#8221; are associated with pleasant feelings. Studies have shown that symbolism within\u00a0phonemes (and the clustering of meaning) cuts across all cultures. Choosing a good hybridised name imbued with sound symbolism therefore ensures that prospects (potential customers) will\u00a0subliminally understand the qualities of the brand irrespective of their national language. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>This universality might suggest to esoteric linguists the premise of a universal tongue, long forgotten, as per the Tower of Babel myth. It&#8217;s actually simpler than that and is a consequence of our shared anatomy beyond racial skin type. Speech is a function of our articulation, which is dependent upon the human vocal apparatus \u2013 the shape of our mouth as a voice box, with the tongue, lips, jaw and other speech organs working in concert.<\/p>\n<p>An &#8220;ahhh&#8221; sound is made with an open mouth and throat. Contrast an &#8220;l&#8221; or long &#8220;e&#8221; or final &#8220;y&#8221; \u2013 where the lips and back of the throat are almost closed. Examining the Muslim word for God, &#8220;Allah&#8221;, in sound symbolic terms, shows that\u00a0it is divided into three phonemes: &#8220;Ah&#8221;\/&#8221;l&#8221;\/&#8221;Ah&#8221;, which\u00a0connotes large \/ small \/ large, and suggests\u00a0an individual feeling truly &#8220;little&#8221;\u00a0before (and in awe of)\u00a0the perceived Almighty.\u00a0This insight is gleaned from Robert M. Hoffsteins&#8217; &#8220;A Mystical Key to the English Language&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Margaret Magnus, in &#8220;Gods of the Word&#8221;, points out how &#8220;str-&#8221;\u00a0invokes <em>linearity and predictability<\/em>: straight, string, strip, stripe,\u00a0street. [c.f. Afrikaans: straal, strand, strek, strik, string, stryk, straat]. Hold that concept. Now\u00a0one sense of \u201c-ap\u201d is <em>flat<\/em>: cap, flap, map, lap, etc. Put \u201cstr\u201d and \u201cap\u201d together,\u00a0and, voil\u00e0,\u00a0you get \u201cstrap\u201d i.e. a flat line.<\/p>\n<p>Phonosemantics\u00a0is applicable whether the word is\u00a0spoken aloud\u00a0or not, because, even while reading, individuals\u00a0have been shown\u00a0to sub-vocalise. Thought and sound are flip-sides to the coinage of language. I think it was Dorian Haarhoff, storyteller extraordinaire who said, &#8220;Let&#8217;s learn together to dance the dance of words with greater \u00e9lan, engagement and enthusiasm, thereby engaging fully with our Source energy&#8230;&#8221;\u00a0 You&#8217;ll surely be\u00a0surprised by the overlay of meaning which you intuit when listening to the\u00a0secret whisperings of words.<\/p>\n<p>No rose would smell sweeter by any other name.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Generating names for a product, brand or company is part of the copywriter&#8217;s repertoire.\u00a0 With the\u00a0dotcom explosion having monopolised\u00a0nearly all names and permutations thereof, wordsmiths have resorted to\u00a0semantic associations, creating hybridised names as a creative way out of this impasse. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/whats-in-a-name\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,8,12,9,7],"tags":[23],"class_list":["post-127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-use","category-letters","category-phonemes","category-sound-symbolism","category-words-2","tag-phonosemantics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":135,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127\/revisions\/135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gavinford.com\/thinkspot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}